![]() |
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Download pdf file (3.2 mb)
|
||
Putting the Public in Public Art Jack Mackie, Public Artist, Seattle, WA Since the early 20th century, “art” has been defined as self-assertion by an artist---the individual’s inquiry as sculptor or painter. These artist’s inquiries, thrust into the public realm, are what most of the public refer to as public art. Alexander Calder’s Flamingo and other artworks like it, are often large-scale sculptures--gallery or museum pieces simply too big to fit inside--that have little or no relationship to their location. More problematic is that these artworks have little relevance to or understanding by the public for whose benefit they have been so placed. Created by the artist and solely expressing the artist’s voice and intent, these works come with their meaning predetermined, and thus suffer no loss of meaning if moved to another site. These private artworks in our plazas are “art in public places.” But it takes more than a public location to make “public art.” Thoughtful community involvement precedes, accompanies, and follows every public artwork. The citizens participate in the selection of the project and the artist. And the artist consults directly and frequently with the “owners” or users of a public space during development of the artwork. Such a process is inclusive and empowers voices in a community not otherwise heard. The
product is art whose content and context cross generational, ethnic,
and class lines,
and thus communicates with a broad audience. The artwork
does not speak solely in the artist’s voice, but translates into
its audience’s language. While the community does not say specifically
what the art will be, their voices about a site--their experience of
place--inspire the images and content of the artwork. .
From The Plan of Nashville:
Avenues to a Great City. |
|||